What Do OCC Trust Charters Actually Let a Custodian Do?
An OCC national trust charter confers federally supervised fiduciary and custodial powers, permitting the entity to act as a custodian and manage stablecoin reserves, with ancillary services allowed only to the extent they fall within its fiduciary powers and approved business plan. It does not confer deposit insurance or a Federal Reserve master account. The OCC granted Circle final approval for First National Digital Currency Bank, N.A. on 10 July 2026, roughly seven months after its December 2025 conditional approval, and issued preliminary conditional approval to World Liberty Trust Company, N.A. on 14 August 2026 under Corporate Decision #1385. Preliminary conditional approval is not authority to operate.
TL;DR — Key Takeaways
- ✓What It Confers: Federally supervised fiduciary and custodial powers — enough to act as a custodian and manage stablecoin reserves, with ancillary services bounded by the approved business plan.
- ✓What It Omits: No deposit insurance and no Federal Reserve master account. A chartered custodian can hold the asset leg while still needing a correspondent for the cash leg.
- ✓The Timeline Gap: Circle: conditional approval December 2025, final approval 10 July 2026 — about seven months. Preliminary conditional approval is not authority to operate.
- ✓Where the Queue Stands: World Liberty Trust Company received preliminary conditional approval 14 August 2026 (OCC CD #1385). Bridge, Laser Digital (Nomura) and Morgan Stanley Digital Trust are named applicants.
- ✓The Open Risk: These are administrative decisions, not statute. Senator Warren has pressed the OCC on chartering firms “seeking to act like banks while evading bank rules”.
One Reason Institutions Care About This Charter
A national trust charter is being pursued by digital-asset custodians for a narrow and specific purpose: to stand within the category of institution that an investment adviser may place client assets with under the Advisers Act custody framework. Everything else the charter provides is secondary to that.
The OCC has issued a run of these decisions. Conditional approvals went to Circle, BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets and Paxos among others in December 2025. Circle received final approval on 10 July 2026 for First National Digital Currency Bank, N.A., trading as Circle National Trust. On 14 August 2026 the OCC issued preliminary conditional approval to World Liberty Trust Company, N.A. under Corporate Decision #1385. Bridge National Trust Bank, Laser Digital National Trust Bank and Morgan Stanley Digital Trust have been named as still in the queue.
The charter is real and it matters. It also does less than the announcements imply, in two ways that show up in operational diligence rather than in a press release.
Ancillary services are permitted only “to the extent those services fall within the bank's fiduciary powers and approved business plan.”
— Davis Wright Tremaine, on the scope of OCC digital-asset trust charters, August 2026
For the custody structures this sits inside, see our guide to institutional RWA custody solutions.
Fiduciary Powers Are Not a Banking Licence
A national trust bank holds assets in a fiduciary capacity. It does not take insured deposits, and the charter carries no deposit insurance and no automatic Federal Reserve master account. Those two absences define what the entity can and cannot do on its own balance sheet.
The operational consequence is the one worth planning around. A chartered custodian can hold the asset leg of a tokenized transaction under federal supervision, and it still depends on a correspondent relationship to move the cash leg. Delivery-versus-payment in that arrangement spans two institutions with different supervisors, different operating hours and different failure modes, which is precisely the seam that atomic settlement is meant to remove.
| Capability | National trust charter | Why it matters to an issuer |
|---|---|---|
| Hold assets in a fiduciary capacity | Yes — the core grant | The basis of any qualified-custodian analysis |
| Manage stablecoin reserves | Yes, within the approved business plan | Brings reserve management under federal supervision |
| Federal rather than state supervision | Yes | Replaces a patchwork of state trust licences |
| FDIC deposit insurance | No | Client cash is not insured deposits at this entity |
| Federal Reserve master account | Not conferred by the charter | The cash leg still runs through a correspondent |
How the adviser-side rule treats these arrangements is examined in SEC custody rule modernization for tokenized assets.
Preliminary Conditional Approval Is Not Permission to Operate
World Liberty Trust Company must still complete remaining steps before it can begin operations, and that is the general position rather than a comment on any one applicant. Circle's own path ran from conditional approval in December 2025 to final approval on 10 July 2026 — roughly seven months, and then operational readiness after that.
This produces a recurring diligence error. A press release announcing conditional approval is widely reported as a firm “receiving a bank charter”, and a counterparty checklist that records the headline date will show a live federally chartered custodian months before one exists. The entity in that window is an applicant with a favourable indication, which is a different thing to contract with.
The three states, and what each supports
- Preliminary conditional approval: the OCC will charter subject to conditions. Supports planning. Does not support placing client assets.
- Final approval: conditions satisfied and the charter granted. Supports contracting, subject to the entity actually being open for business.
- Operating: the bank is open and performing the fiduciary function. The only state in which a custody arrangement is real.
The practical instruction is to ask which of the three states an intended custodian is in, on what date, and against which OCC decision document — and to re-ask before the arrangement goes live rather than at the term-sheet stage.
The Conditions Are in the Decision Document, Not the Coverage
OCC approvals carry conditions, and the conditions are set out in the corresponding corporate decision — for World Liberty Trust Company, Corporate Decision #1385. Secondary coverage of these approvals generally does not enumerate them, so any capital, liquidity or operating-agreement requirement has to be read from the decision itself.
This matters because conditions are where the substance of a narrow charter lives. The grant of fiduciary powers is short and similar across approvals; what differentiates one chartered entity from another is the approved business plan and the operating conditions attached to it. Two custodians can both be federally chartered national trust banks and be permitted to do materially different things.
For an issuer, the useful request in diligence is therefore not “are you OCC chartered?” but a copy of the decision document and the scope of the approved business plan — specifically whether the services being contracted for sit inside it. Anything outside the plan is not covered by the charter regardless of how the entity is described in marketing.
Where an asset's classification decides who may hold it at all is covered in the custody gap between fund shares and digital securities.
An Administrative Framework Can Change Without Congress
These charters are agency decisions rather than statutory entitlements. Senator Elizabeth Warren has pressed the OCC on approving special charters for crypto firms she characterises as seeking to act like banks while evading bank rules, and that pressure is directed at the chartering posture itself rather than at any individual approval.
The risk this creates for an issuer is not that existing charters are revoked, which would be an extraordinary step. It is that the pipeline slows, that conditions attached to future approvals tighten, or that supervisory expectations for chartered entities shift after a custody arrangement is already in place. A charter granted under one agency posture is supervised under whichever posture follows.
The reasonable planning assumption is that the charter is durable and the operating expectations around it are not fixed. That argues for custody arrangements with defined exit and transfer mechanics rather than ones that assume a single custodian relationship for the life of a fund.
What to Establish Before Naming a Chartered Custodian
The charter answers one question — whether the entity has federally supervised fiduciary powers — and leaves the operational ones open. Five checks separate a usable custody arrangement from a favourable press release.
Custody diligence checklist
- Approval state and date. Preliminary conditional, final, or open for business — with the OCC decision number.
- Scope of the approved business plan. Do the services you are buying sit inside it, or are they ancillary services outside the fiduciary grant?
- Cash leg arrangements. Which correspondent moves money, on what hours, and what happens to settlement when that relationship is disrupted.
- Asset segregation and control. How assets are held and who holds the keys, since the qualified-custodian analysis turns on control in practice rather than on the charter alone.
- Exit mechanics. How assets transfer to another custodian, on what timeline, and who bears the cost if supervisory conditions change.
A note on the limits of this account. The dates, names and Corporate Decision #1385 are well established across sources, but the specific capital minimums and operating-agreement conditions attached to these approvals are not enumerated in secondary coverage. Anyone relying on a numeric condition should read the decision document rather than any summary, including this one.
For the wider structural context, see our institutional guide to RWA tokenization.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does an OCC national trust charter actually confer?
Federally supervised fiduciary and custodial powers. That lets the entity act as a custodian and manage stablecoin reserves under national rather than state supervision. Ancillary services are permitted only to the extent they fall within the bank's fiduciary powers and its approved business plan, so the charter is narrower than a full banking licence and does not open the door to arbitrary adjacent business lines.
Does a trust charter make a custodian a qualified custodian?
It is the route most applicants are pursuing, and it is the reason the charter matters commercially. A national bank with fiduciary powers falls within the categories the Advisers Act custody framework recognises, which is what an investment adviser needs before placing client assets with it. The charter is a necessary structural step; whether a specific arrangement satisfies the rule still depends on how assets are held and controlled in practice.
What does a national trust charter not include?
Deposit insurance and a Federal Reserve master account. A trust bank holds assets in a fiduciary capacity rather than taking insured deposits, and a charter does not carry an automatic entitlement to settle at the central bank. The practical consequence is that a chartered custodian can hold the asset leg of a transaction while still depending on a correspondent bank for the cash leg.
What is the difference between conditional and final approval?
Preliminary conditional approval is not authority to operate. It signals the OCC is prepared to charter the entity subject to conditions the applicant must satisfy first, and the applicant must complete remaining steps before beginning operations. Circle received conditional approval in December 2025 and final approval on 10 July 2026 — roughly seven months apart. Treating a conditional-approval press release as evidence of a live custodian is a diligence error.
Who has been approved so far?
The OCC issued conditional approvals in December 2025 to Circle, BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, Paxos and others. Circle received final approval on 10 July 2026 for First National Digital Currency Bank, N.A., doing business as Circle National Trust. World Liberty Trust Company, N.A. received preliminary conditional approval on 14 August 2026 under OCC Corporate Decision #1385. Bridge National Trust Bank, Laser Digital National Trust Bank and Morgan Stanley Digital Trust have been named as applicants still in the queue.
Is the charter route politically settled?
No. Senator Elizabeth Warren has pressed the OCC on approving special charters for crypto firms she describes as seeking to act like banks while evading bank rules. The charters granted to date are administrative decisions, not statute, which means the framework is subject to change under a different agency leadership without Congress acting. An issuer building a multi-year custody arrangement should treat the supervisory posture as a live variable.
Related Articles
Institutional RWA Custody Solutions and Compliance
The pillar covering custody structures for tokenized assets.
SEC Custody Rule Modernization for Tokenized Assets
The adviser-side rule this charter is meant to satisfy.
The Custody Gap Between Fund Shares and Digital Securities
Where classification decides who may hold an asset.
What Is RWA Tokenization? A Complete Institutional Guide
The structural context for custody decisions.